Talk:Great Norwegian Encyclopedia

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Books: Reference works

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article is supported by the Reference works task force.

Press release ref

The source labelled "Press release from Kunnskapsforlaget, 16.09.2008", pointing here, brings up an empty page - I suspect they change their URLs. Can someone find a more suitable ref?--92.40.147.48 (talk) 07:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Comprehensive"

What does "comprehensive" mean in the first sentence—i.e., how did they quantify it? Number of articles, or what?

Also, that statement definitely needs a reference...both to verify that SNL is the second-most, and that Wikipedia is the most. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 01:19, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New publiser has no entry in Brønnøysundregistrene

Since 2010, the encyclopedia has had a new publisher — Norsk nettlesikon.

It seems like they do not have an entry in Brønnøysund Register Centre.

Aren't they supposed to?--85.165.229.54 (talk) 10:58, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Store norske leksikon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100315160414/http://www.idg.no:80/computerworld/article161387.ece? to http://www.idg.no/computerworld/article161387.ece&f=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:34, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Store norske leksikon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.idg.no/computerworld/article161387.ece&f=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:19, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Primary sources and potential COI

Major updates contributed by User: Ebben almost exclusively cite sources published by the encyclopedia itself. I suggest this user clarify potential COI. Henrik Dvergsdal 20:09, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]