Talk:Great Northern Highway/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:08, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Right. Will read and jot queries below: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:08, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
-
Economically, it is a vital link as it provides access through the Wheatbelt and Mid West to the resource rich regions of the Pilbara and Kimberley....I'd just say, " Economically, it provides vital access through the Wheatbelt and Mid West to the resource rich regions of the Pilbara and Kimberley." (let facts speak for themselves)- Done - Evad37 [talk] 09:51, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
-
Port Hedland link were completed over the next two years, with the last part officially opened on 16 December 1989 by Bob Brown and Bob Pearce- link (or redlink) these blokes- Done - Evad37 [talk] 09:51, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
with the road widened, turning and overtaking lanes constructed, and improved street lighting- it flow smoother if all three were passive verbs, so "with the road widened, turning and overtaking lanes constructed, and street lighting improved"- Done - Evad37 [talk] 09:51, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- Work on Great Northern Highway has remained ceaseless - odd construction..plenty of options for rewording to make more natural-sounding.
- Could you elaborate, or provide examples? - Evad37 [talk] 09:51, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- "Work on Great Northern Highway has been continuous", "Work on Great Northern Highway has continued without pause/gone on without pause" are a couple of permutations that come to mind....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:43, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- Done, changed remained ceaseless → been continuous - Evad37 [talk] 13:51, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- "Work on Great Northern Highway has been continuous", "Work on Great Northern Highway has continued without pause/gone on without pause" are a couple of permutations that come to mind....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:43, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- Could you elaborate, or provide examples? - Evad37 [talk] 09:51, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- Work on Great Northern Highway has remained ceaseless - odd construction..plenty of options for rewording to make more natural-sounding.
A 21-kilometre-long (13 mi) section of between New Norcia and Walebing is scheduled to been reconstructed between mid-2014 and 2016- err, could remove the "of" and ..."been" to "be"?- Done - Evad37 [talk] 09:51, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
As of 2014, the project is awaiting federal approvals- should "approvals" be plural?- Done - Evad37 [talk] 09:51, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- I'm taking that as a "yes" then....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:36, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- Woops, yes, I meant to say that the source uses the plural form - Evad37 [talk] 13:44, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- I'm taking that as a "yes" then....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:36, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- Done - Evad37 [talk] 09:51, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
No blackspots or historical horror accidents...?- Nothing beyond the routine stuff covered by WP:NOTNEWS - Evad37 [talk] 09:51, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Overall, a nice read and within striking distance of GA. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:44, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, I have replied to your comments above. - Evad37 [talk] 09:51, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
1. Well written?:
- Prose quality:
- Manual of Style compliance:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
- References to sources:
- Citations to reliable sources, where required:
- No original research:
3. Broad in coverage?:
- Major aspects:
- Focused:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
- Fair representation without bias:
5. Reasonably stable?
- No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
- Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
The two images - File:Paynes find c1980 ewd.JPG and File:Wyndham 1962 EW Digby-15.jpg should they have OTRS for licencing if Gnangarra wasn't the author? Might be wroth clearing up before potential FAC...? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:35, 10 August 2014 (UTC)Images to be fixed with OTRS later. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:07, 16 August 2014 (UTC) - Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
- Pass or Fail: -
pending image licencing query above. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:35, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- I have asked Gnangarra to comment on the images/licencing - Evad37 [talk] 11:09, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- @Casliber: I have removed the images for now; Gnangarra advises that he'll "address an otrs ticket but it wont be with the time period of ga review" - Evad37 [talk] 00:20, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- I have asked Gnangarra to comment on the images/licencing - Evad37 [talk] 11:09, 11 August 2014 (UTC)