Talk:Great Nicobar serpent eagle

Birds Low‑importance

Great Nicobar serpent eagle is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Common name

Might be "Nicobar Serpent-eagle", if the northern Nicobar population does not belong to S. cheela. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 23:14, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

South Nicobar Serpent Eagle, as defined by virtually all authorities, is S. klossi. It seems there was some taxonomic confusion over this taxon compared to minimus, and I'll deal with this shortly. I've changed Nicobar Serpent Eagle to a disambiguation page since the name can refer to both. • Rabo³ • 17:37, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Source Two

Is Theamazingfact.com really a reliable source? "Fun Facts" websites are, unfortunately, rife with disinformation and the website appears not to even be around anymore. Nyonyatwelve (talk) 02:33, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]