Talk:Great Mosque of Gaza/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi. I am reviewing this article for GA. I have gone through the article and find it excellent. I added a few architectural wikilinks.

• You have a quote in the lead, "beautiful", which theoretically should be referenced. But since you have the same quote referenced in the article, I think that rule can be skipped in this case. The article leaves room for expansion at a later date, but the basic ground work is done. A very good job! —Mattisse (Talk) 01:26, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): The prose is excellent b (MoS): Follows MoS

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): References are reliable c (OR): No OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): Sets historical context b (focused): Remains focused on the subject of the article

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias: NPOV

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

This is an excellent little article. Passes GA. Congradulations! —Mattisse (Talk) 01:26, 12 January 2009 (UTC)