Talk:Great Mills High School

Maryland Mid‑importance

	Maryland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Reasoning for assessment: Not much here and minimal references. Adam McCormick (talk) 04:57, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is requested that an image or photograph of Great Mills High School be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled

I am a freshman at Great Mills. I think it his an okay school. I am involved in there NJROTC program. Ricky117 15:22, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Ricky. Now here's donna with the weather. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.17.116.208 (talk)

Q

Hmmm. I know wp:Notcensored - but since perpetrators of certain crimes do so sometimes for "fame," should WP even name them?--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 19:30, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I know pretty much every other shooting article names the perpetrator if it is known. I think naming the shooter now may be premature as is stating a relationship with one or both of the victims. Rumors and speculation abound in the hours after an event like this and the media is often quick to report without fact checking.Danbert8 (talk) 19:34, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think it more seemly to identify the perpetrator by name only once and use "the assailant" the rest of the time. My 2 cents.--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 20:19, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weapon

Removed a reference to a Glock handgun being the weapon the perpetrator used. Please do not add a weapon unless there is a source to back it up. Also make sure the source is reliable as initial reports of weapons used are often uninformed or wrong.Danbert8 (talk) 19:37, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A reference used elsewhere stated that the weapon used was a Glock 9mm hangun. I updated to the correct reference for the claim. Danbert8 (talk) 20:33, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rounds' various trajectories

WP runs by not truth but verifiability. Granted. And the shooting case is one involving poetic legend versus prosaic fact. Early reports are so often inaccurate and, iindeed, in this case the early reports stated that Desmond Barnes had been shot by Rollins. He wasn't. According to witnesses, Barnes was surprised he'd been hit in the thigh, Barnes' having not been shot at close range but from afar. No ballistic tests have been cited indicating Barnes had been shot by Rollins. What the Sheriff's office has said is "investigators are still trying to determine which bullets struck which individuals"[1]/ "nor was it clear how the 14-year-old boy was wounded, St. Mary's County Sheriff Tim Cameron said. But the sheriff credited the officer with preventing any more loss of life."[2] I've updated the article (Diff). Which will be quixotic 'cos drivebyes will continually change it back. (History-with-a-capital-H possesses much grandeur; historiography, aridness..)--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 07:57, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]