Talk:Great Fire of New York

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firefighting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to firefighting on Wikipedia! If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.FirefightingWikipedia:WikiProject FirefightingTemplate:WikiProject FirefightingFirefighting articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why is this "America's first major disaster"? The 1776 fire in NYC burned a comparable amount of buildings and burned for about as long, with less sophisticated equipment, and during wartime. I suggest the reference be removed.Shoreranger 01:29, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Propose moving this article to Great Fire of New York (1835)

Since there is an article Great Fire of New York (1776), we may as well title this article Great Fire of New York (1835) and make Great Fire of New York a disambig page.

--Richard 20:05, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why. This one was the last and greatest. WWI was The Great War until WWII came along and, as in that case, there is no need to change this article's name unless a future greater one burns out the whole East Side or something. Jim.henderson 20:15, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support: I wrote the bulk of both articles. I always thought the 1776 fire was the more important of the two and then wondered in here surprised to find that 1835 caught the title. They are both very significant. I'm not entirely comfortable with the argument of the "last great New York fire" being in 1835. If I remember correctly there was a fire six years ago that dwarfed both of these by any measure. Americasroof 20:58, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amendment: I shouldn't brag about writing the 1776 article. I wrote a lot about the Battle of Long Island and set up the New York Revolutionary War stuff. The 1776 article was mostly written by others. Americasroof 21:02, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, any measure except percentage of town destroyed. No big rich-country city has had such a major fraction burnt since April 1906 except in war. But if fraction were the criterion then the fire that turned Brantwood, Wisconsin into a ghost town in the 1960s would qualify. Anyway, you've got me convinced. Wait a couple patriotic days and if nobody else squawks, go ahead. Jim.henderson 23:32, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done.Shoreranger 16:50, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Undone. When there are precisely two articles with the same title, no disambiguation page is needed because disambiguation is more efficiently handled with dablinks at the top of each article. Which page gets the parenthetical added to its title is debatable, of course. It's hardly important in this case, considering the few links to these pages, but the 1776 fire can be given the default undisambiguated title if someone feels strongly enough about it to do the paperwork. If ever there's an article on a third Great Fire of New York, at that point we'd need a disambiguation page. —Kevin Myers 03:34, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What about the Great New York Fire of 1845?

The article states this was the last great New York Fire, and there's a link to an article about a great New York fire ten years later. A lesser great New York Fire, to be sure. Roughly half as destructive. But still pretty big. That sentence stating 1835 was the last great New York Fire needs to be either rewritten or removed.Xfpisher (talk) 14:37, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Great Fire of New York. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:53, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]