Talk:Great Book of Lecan

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Missing pages

I find in amazon's description of the book "Discovery of the Tomb of Ollamh Foohla", the author is said to says "The first nine folios of the Book of Lecan were lost, until discovered by me a few years ago, bound up in a volume of the Seabright Collection, in the Library of Trinity College." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.83.107.61 (talk) 18:06, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the missing nine folios were found to be TCD MS 1319 (formerly TCD, H 2 17) and have been added to the digital version of the Book of Lecan, which now numbers 311 folios. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.1.235.117 (talk) 21:59, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]