Talk:Great Barrington, Massachusetts/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: TheSpecialUser (talk · contribs) 10:28, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
I fear, I've to quickly fail this. I'm sorry but this article is not near to GA status and issues can't be fixed within a month or some so failing it. Here is an brief explanation of the problems:
- Refs - Majority of them are WP:Bare URLs and some are unreliable sources which makes this eligible for a quick fail
- Unref - Large amounts of facts are unreferenced and needs WP:RS using WP:Citing sources
- Lead - per WP:LEAD, it should summarize the article and should be neutral which it is not
- Neutrality - There are WP:PEACOCK terms in the article as well as few statements are not neutral.
- Images - They look awkward and caption needs to improved as well as needs WP:ALT
- MoS - There are many small paras and in the way they are, are not proper. The structure of the article is little too poor
- Incomplete - There is a lot of info that can be added to the topic thus this is an incomplete article
- Phrase - It needs throughout copyediting.