Talk:Greaser Act

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This article doesn't actually say what the law did, exactly, and repetitively states how the law was discriminatory, but again, without details. 220.136.32.38 (talk) 15:39, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why does this article not refer to the act by its actual name (Anti Vagrancy Act of 1855)? BBRR18 (talk) 19:15, 10 March 2017 (UTC)BBRR18[reply]

Have you looked into other specific examples of anti-immigrant or discriminatory laws? It seems that this article is lacking from the specifics of the context that you try to give. BBRR18 (talk) 19:15, 10 March 2017 (UTC) BBRR18[reply]

This is not an act pertaining to immigration. So said examples would be irrelevant. Tmangray (talk) 05:04, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): BBRR18.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:39, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tag Should Now Be Removed

Plenty of references to secondary sources have been added. The tag should be removed. Tmangray (talk) 05:04, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]