Talk:Gravenche

Fishes Low‑importance

	Fish portal This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Extinction Low‑importance

	This article is a part of WikiProject Extinction, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on extinction and extinct organisms. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.ExtinctionWikipedia:WikiProject ExtinctionTemplate:WikiProject ExtinctionExtinction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to gravenche —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 20:02, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lake Geneva whitefish → Coregonus hiemalis — "Lake Geneva whitefish" is not the most commonly used name for this species, only being used in Kottelat & Freyhof. No common names are in serious use in the English-speaking world, with none given at FishBase, and no German or French names would be unambiguous and appropriate. Therefore I propose this page be moved to this species's scientific name. —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 16:57, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support. The facts given by Innotata indicate that this should be at the scientific name. Similar situations have been discussed for rodents. Ucucha 09:09, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The IUCN is using Gravenche as common name --Melly42 (talk) 16:12, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, and according to FishBase, this name applies to no other species. However, it is not listed as an English name by anybody except the IUCN, and it does not seem to be the most common name, or not by any large margin. —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 22:40, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The book "Extinctions in Near Time" (1999) by Ross MacPhee is also using Gravenche as common name --Melly42 (talk) 11:09, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to be only rarely used as an English common name. It scarcely needs stating that the scientific name is most prevalent. —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 18:50, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose this page should be moved to "gravenche". —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 19:56, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gravenche. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20010830023041/http://www.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp to http://www.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]