Talk:Gravedigger

Death Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cemeteries High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cemeteries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cemeteries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CemeteriesWikipedia:WikiProject CemeteriesTemplate:WikiProject CemeteriesCemeteries articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occupations (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupations, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OccupationsWikipedia:WikiProject OccupationsTemplate:WikiProject OccupationsOccupations articles

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2020 and 15 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kizlurtzman.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:38, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[Untitled]

This article survived an AfD nomination of October 15 2005, found here. Marskell 17:01, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Gravedigger (forum context)

I've seen a few people mention that the term "gravedigger" is used to brand those who essentially "dig" up old threads that would be considered dead due to a lack of interest and overall activity. Would that be relevant to cover in the article? 75.2.9.203 23:41, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. Most people (in the real world) couldn't care less about stuff like this, but I wouldn't be suprised if it gets included anyway, as the majority of Wikipedia editors do. - 85.210.43.171 18:13, 23 November 2006 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned[reply]

Error, but how to fix?

"in the first three or fifty centuries of the Christian Era" is obviously wrong, but what should it say? "the first three to fifth"? "the third to fifth"? Huw Powell (talk) 20:29, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Gang culture"

hi. the section Gang culture was added in january 2009, and removed in may 2009 by Eleland as a hoax. in november 2009, the section was restored and exists in the current revision. problem is, the sources dont back up the assertions, and the whole section just sounds wrong. i, for one, never heard of this, but i dont know gang culture as well as others might. -badmachine 18:36, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Gravedigger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20051211005553/http://education.yahoo.com:80/homework_help/cliffsnotes/hamlet/60.html to http://education.yahoo.com/homework_help/cliffsnotes/hamlet/60.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:48, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gravedigger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:58, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

relevance of "Marxism" section?

i question the relevance of a whole section for a single metaphorical use, which is self-explanatory within the texts where it originates and isn't directly relevant to the topic