Talk:Graphical timeline of the universe

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles

Topic & Title

This is a useful timeline, but it appears to be not a timeline of the universe, as the title and parts of the introduction would indicate, but rather a timeline of conditions of habitability of the solar system. Wikipedia has longer scale timelines apropos the universe, e.g., those linked from Chronology of the universe, including Graphical timeline from Big Bang to Heat Death. --Figsyrup (talk) 02:34, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

article

Shouldn't the value at the bottom of this chart be 5.391e-44 instead of 0, since the "Big Bang" doesn't deal with values smaller than Planck Time?

Since I changed the origin, this comment no longer applies.

I changed the origin to easier tell the difference between the past and the future, by having negative time values for the past. Najro 08:20, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since this is an English article, milliard should be replaced by billion. --Jellyturtle 21:24, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why is 'Earth's surface too hot for life' so long before 'evaporation of earth's oceans'? We know hyperthermophilic life can exist even above the boiling point, so it seems life would not end from heat alone, but from lack of water after the oceans were gone. Vultur (talk) 09:46, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redo this template

I think this template should be redone using Template:Graphical_timeline which would increase the visual appeal of the current version. --Tobias1984 (talk) 10:58, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nature timeline

I think {{Nature timeline}} should be removed from this article. Although the time periods have significant overlap, the main timeline is more detailed in all relevant information. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 22:28, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article quality question?

I have a lot of problems with this article

1. It's not the universe, it's about the solar system. 2. I think there are links, but most of the links don't work? 3. What do the color bars mean? There's no guide 223.24.188.7 (talk) 18:29, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]