Talk:Grant writing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is prone to spam. Please monitor the References and External links sections.

Growth?

Is philanthropy growing? needs backup besides a grant-oriented site. I suspect it's because more people are aware of available grants out there. Julia Rossi (talk) 07:06, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar

There is a host of... (not 'there are a host of...')

How to material

Some of this material should probably be moved to Wikibooks or Wikiversity. Tisane ^talk/_stalk 05:42, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely. I would say "most" more than "some".200.106.94.105 (talk) 08:23, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree that most of the material is "how to content" which does not belong on wikipedia. I am working on edits removing all of the how to information in the "background" section, as well as clarifying and expanding on the remaining information. SydneyL23 (talk) 18:15, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I added the "manual tag" to show that clean-up of the "how to article" is necessary. SydneyL23 (talk) 05:45, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External Links

There needs to be some rhyme and reason for the links. For example, while NASA grant links and the other gov agency links are interesting and perhaps useful, shall we post grant links from ALL the various gov agencies? And the various "professional" orgs that are related to grants... Some just seem like for-profits that you pay to help you get grants... There needs to be a standard. =//= Johnny Squeaky 01:49, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Compound noun or hyphenation

Has anyone got current English usage rates of this spelling? The trend in modern times is to hyphenate and then ultimately combine the two words, due to their close association and combined meaning. I do find "grant-writing," hyphenated, online. Why would this word combination be any different than fund-raising or proofreading or similar compounds?67.61.55.179 (talk) 22:02, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Technical and Professional Communication

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 September 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): SydneyL23 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Bl00burry19.

— Assignment last updated by Savmanbanans (talk) 17:29, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Career

I think it makes sense to add a section on grant writing as a career to this article. Does anyone know any good sources for this? SydneyL23 (talk) 18:50, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am adding a short section about the career using sources from Grant Writing: Practical Strategies for Scholars and Professionals and Grant Writer: Career Outlook: US Bureau of Labor Statistics. Please feel free to expand on this section and relocate it within the article. SydneyL23 (talk) 19:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Background Section

I noticed that at least half of the information included in the background section fell under the category of “how-to writing” and/or the background information a writer needs to collect before beginning to write a grant, not general background information about grant writing. I went through and deleted every sentence that did not belong in this section. This left me with a handful of well-written sentences that contained good information, but there was no logical order to them. I restructured these remaining sentences into two short paragraphs: one about grant funders and one about requests for proposals. I edited these sentences for clarity, concision, and cohesion. I also added two new sources to expand on and support the information provided in these paragraphs: The Only Grant Writing Book You’ll Ever Need and Grant Writing: Practical Strategies for Scholars and Professionals. While I believe the information in this section can be expanded on, the Background section no longer breaks the rules of Wikipedia, and I believe the above process should be followed with the remainder of the article.SydneyL23 (talk) 18:51, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Grantsmanship into Grant writing

wide overlap. fgnievinski (talk) 19:26, 11 January 2024 (UTC) fgnievinski (talk) 19:26, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

seconded @Fgnievinski Dawkin Verbier (talk) 11:33, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]