Talk:Grandville (comics)
A fact from Grandville (comics) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 October 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Change article and created new one
[edit]I've created a new article entitled Grandville (graphic novel), devoting it just to the first volume of the series. I'm turning "Grandville (comics)" into an article covering the series in general. ISD (talk) 16:04, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Do we really need this? It largely replicates information here, just dropping in a larger plot section (which is not a good idea in itself). It would have been better to start a discussion on splitting this article first as I could see it being merged back in here as it stands. (Emperor (talk) 01:52, 26 May 2011 (UTC))
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Grandville (comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091202064734/http://savagecritic.com/2009/10/political-fursona.html to http://savagecritic.com/2009/10/political-fursona.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:53, 24 March 2017 (UTC)