Talk:Grand Orange Lodge of Scotland

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

"Currently found urinating all over the meadows in Edinburgh"

Is this right?

No, it was vandalism and has now been removed. If you see this sort of thing again feel free to correct it yourself! Thanks Suicidalhamster 11:26, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I feel that this is purely in the opinion of the creator, and I highly doubt Ian Wilson said that which was quoted. Would you cite your source? 91.105.206.5 17:29, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Appropriate Information?

"In 1976 in Scotland, the Grand Lodge was frustrated in its attempt to expel a leading member of the Ulster Defence Association, Roddy MacDonald, from the Order, because of widespread support for the loyalist. The Order's democratic organisation makes it difficult for the Grand Lodge to overrule county or individual lodges. Other Scottish members were later convicted of smuggling guns and explosives to the UDA, although the Ulster Volunteer Force is thought to command more support among Scottish loyalists in recent years."

For such a small article this paragraph seems to be here purely to misinform readers of the Orange Lodges activities. Apart from the 2 line introduction the reader has to learn about the UDA and UVF activities before they even know simple facts about the Grand Orange Lodge of Scotland. There are no citations to these claims either. I think that this article should be include more relevant information and that the paragraph in question be deleted.

"the Grand Orange Lodge of Scotland is a (now) relatively minor entity advocating unionism in Scotland and the continuance of the United Kingdom.[2][4] Out of a Scottish population of over 5 million people, it claims only 50,000 members,"

50,000 members is 1% of the Scottish population and, if true, would make the order a significant organisation, not 'minor'. 50,000 is also more individual members than any political party in Scotland, possibly more than all the political parties combined (some don't publicise figures).Inaspicious (talk) 18:10, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Name Change?

Orange Order in Canada is an article with the same purpose as this article, namely describing Orangeism in Canada. Therefore, for the sake of uniformity, I propose that this article be changed to Orange order in Scotland or that the Canadian one be changed to Grand Orange Lodge of British America. Thoughts? Threadnecromancer (talk) 19:50, 22 November 2015 (UTC)THreadnecromancer

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Grand Orange Lodge of Scotland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]