Talk:Grand Korean Waterway

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups.

Map needed

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in South Korea may be able to help!

Redirect request

can someone create a re-direct from "Pan Korea Grand Waterway" to this page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.76.15.212 (talk) 02:24, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pan Korea Grand Waterway doesn't seem to be a page. Do you mean to make it a page and then make the redirect? If you search for it, you would end up here anyway, I'm sure. Are you sure it is needed? DaronDierkes (talk) 02:40, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Kusunose 05:01, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bias

We have to remove the opinion pieces or find citations for them. Maybe try to quote Korean Herald article interviews or something, either way the article is biased against lee and the canal project. Da Baron (talk) 04:33, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree; in the meantime, I've added several ^{[citation needed]} tags throughout the article in places where the statements are seemingly most opinionated or biased. Swikid (talk) 16:15, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar

The article needs more work, i'm no expert i just tried to make it sound correct. i think this article was drafted by a contributor w/ english a a 2nd language. Da Baron (talk) 04:33, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree; I've done what I could for now to clean up the grammar, spelling and general use of language throughout the article, especially in places where it most obviously needed some attention. Swikid (talk) 16:22, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures of the waterway.

It would seem only fitting for someone to post a picture of the grand canal. I would, but I can't figure out how to upload pictures. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Toesti (talk • contribs) 13:32, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Left hand side of the screen. Toolbox. Upload Pictures. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shinyulim (talk • contribs) 20:54, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The canal doesn't exist, there are no photos, other than an artist's conception perhaps. It's still in the planning stages - and hopefully will stay that way. --Bentonia School (talk) 07:43, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update needed

The section about the project in Lee Myung-bak's article is more up-to-date than this article, but still contains some speculation. So, this article should at least reflect the same state of information. --Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 17:10, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]