Talk:Grammy Award for Best Global Music Album

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Grammy Award for Best Global Music Album article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Grammy Award for Best Global Music Album is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 25, 2011	Featured list candidate	Promoted

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Awards: Grammy Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by Grammy Awards task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Regional and national music Low‑importance

	Grammy Award for Best Global Music Album is within the scope of the WikiProject Regional and national music, an attempt at building a resource on the music of all the peoples and places of the world. Please visit the project's listing to see the article's assessment and to help us improve the article as we push to 1.0.Regional and national musicWikipedia:WikiProject Regional and national musicTemplate:WikiProject Regional and national musicRegional and national music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Roots music Low‑importance

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Roots music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to roots, folk and traditional folk music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Roots musicWikipedia:WikiProject Roots musicTemplate:WikiProject Roots musicRoots music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge proposal

The Grammy category Grammy Award for Best World Music Album was split into Grammy Award for Best Traditional World Music Album and Grammy Award for Best Contemporary World Music Album from 2004 to 2011. They are true subcategories, as evidenced by how they will be remerged in 2012. I believe this article would do well to include the albums from 2004 to 2011. The sections could be "recipients 1992-2003", "recipients 2004-2011", and, once nominations are here, "recipients 2012-". The section handling the two categories would explain the split and use two columns. In this way, all the World Music Album winners are in one place that has a good formatting and the two articles on the split categories can be redirected here without issue. Hekerui (talk) 08:08, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support Good idea. Adabow (talk · contribs) 05:27, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sounds good. Novice7 (talk) 12:58, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Interesting. My gut instinct was to oppose the merge, fearing the article could become too long and because there are enough entries and details for the subcategories to warrant their own article. Good articles exist for categories with as few as one to four entries. --Another Believer _(Talk) 14:22, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Having looked at the list again, I oppose the merge. I believe that articles for both the Traditional and Contemporary categories could be promoted to Good status once expanded. I am happy to work on expanding these categories as soon as I can. --Another Believer _(Talk) 14:42, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your work on the Grammy articles. The subcategories themselves are not distinguished by any means other than selection of releases and the releases themselves - wouldn't there be hardly anything "Grammy-ish" to cover with those releases, and much of it redundant to this article? I remember checking Google News after the Grammys and the winners got almost no coverage. What would the content be that could be put into the articles on the split award categories? (Sorry if that sounds like a request for crystalballing ;) Hekerui (talk) 15:42, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Having separate articles allows the opportunity to provide detail about the nominated works and artists and to note trends relating to the category. See my profile page for links to ten or so GA-status Grammy articles. The Contemporary and Traditional World Music articles would be similar. Once expanded, a merge would not be necessary. I do agree with you that we need to establish a system to connect award categories together. Perhaps a timeline or template at the bottom illustrating a category's evolution over time. Even images could be helpful (example, World Music category with arrows showing a split to Contemporary and Traditional, then arrows showing their merge). This would help viewers to see the evolution of the award. (Note: A discussion relating to Timelines began here. I am happy to bring the topic up for conversation again, though not at the link provided since this thread is archived.) --Another Believer _(Talk) 15:53, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I am currently working on both articles and tagged each with the "under construction" banner. My intent is not to stop this discussion but rather to make sure all articles have reached their potential. I hope to have both articles completed in a week's time. --Another Believer _(Talk) 17:05, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no hurry :) Hekerui (talk) 18:57, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grammy Award for Best World Music Album. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120201120225/http://www.grammy.com/nominees to http://www.grammy.com/nominees

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:17, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grammy Award for Best World Music Album. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091027163924/http://www.grammy.com/recording_academy/ to http://www2.grammy.com/Recording_Academy/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:49, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update

The last paragraph of the lede, about statistics, is clearly out of date. Can someone update it? Rigadoun (talk) 15:52, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]