Talk:Graham v. John Deere Co.

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article appears to be written to an audience that understands a great deal about the subject. Perhaps it should not assume that knowledge. For example, I do not understand the first line at all. Given we should not assume knowledge on Wikipedia, I think it should be dumbed down, (for lack of a better phrase). Supertigerman 03:16, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the date of the Hotchkiss v. Greenwood from 1851 to 1850. See http://supreme.justia.com/us/52/248/index.html (which is on the Supreme Court website). JeffJoslin 19:24, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am confused by this article. The third paragraph ends: "Calmar and Colgate-Palmolive sought a declaration of invalidity and non-infringement of the patent, and Cook Chemical Co. sought to maintain an action for infringement. The validity of the patent was sustained by the District Court and the Eighth Circuit affirmed." Then the last paragraph of the article ends: "Clark further held that the differences between Scoggin’s design and the prior art were simply too minor and non-technical to maintain the validity of Cook’s patent." Was the Cook patent ruled valid, or not? 204.78.172.14 (talk) 20:35, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]