Jump to content

Talk:Graham Capill

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Consensual sex?

[edit]

I've removed the following sentence

Two weeks before his sentencing, Capill has sent an email to his supporters stating that the sex with one of the girls had been consensual. [1]

Sex with a minor can never be consensual (especially not one less than 12 years old). What this statement actually says is that according to Capill, one of his victims didn't struggle or show obvious distress during the assault. Presumably the others did.-gadfium 01:22, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, no problem. I've added back in the Stuff news story though as it is a source for the sentence he received. Evil Monkey∴Hello 01:25, July 14, 2005 (UTC)

Speculation about future events

[edit]

Removed the foll speculation from the article. I suggest it is not reinstated unless a documentary reference is included.

"It is speculated that since Capill was identified with the Christian Heritage Party for so long, the party's performance in the 2005 elections might suffer as a consequence of his conviction."

Nurg 00:39, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I've removed the 'See Also' section because the solitary link to Stuff.co.nz had stopped working.

On a factually accurate term I just added

[edit]

Is Graham Capill a christian? Yes.

Is he a convicted pedophile? Yes.

Then there is no reason to object to calling him a "christian pedophile".

I think perhaps you are trying to imply that there is a link between his Christianity and his pedophilia. This is only speculation on your part. The change you made to the article doesn't improve it at all.-gadfium 22:39, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never practiced law

[edit]

I'm not a lawyer nor do I have much experience in the legal field so perhaps my understanding is different from one in such a field but I find it strange that someone who was a police prosecutor would be described as having 'never practiced law'. I assume this means he has never praticed law privately but still, as a lay person I feel saying he's never practiced law is just plain odd. BTW I should add the article doesn't even mention he was qualified to practice law until it mentions he was a police prosecutor and then that he was forbidden from practicing law Nil Einne 12:35, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Prison wages or prison salary?

[edit]

The article suggests that Capill's family were burdened due to his inability to earn income as a prisoner by practicing law. Since when is a prisoner allowed to either practice law, or earn money (other than for sewing mailbags, etc.)? Fanx (talk) 16:49, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

edit conflicts

[edit]

There were just some odd looking edits, which appear to be edit conflicts, possibly involving a bot. Probably need to revisit this once interest in the page has died off. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:13, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Graham Capill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:26, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Graham Capill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:50, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Graham_Capill&oldid=1200619978"