Talk:Graham Allison

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This article needs to say more about Allison's background. Was he born a blue-blood, or into a blue-collar family? What did his father (Allison, Sr.), mother, and siblings (if any) do for work? Is he married, divorced, does he have kids? Besides fly-fishing, what are his hobbies? He's a Democrat, his wife Elizabeth is a Republican (economist). Etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.8.17.117 (talk) 15:14, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree. Pablete85 (talk) 22:26, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Graham T. Allison. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604040753/http://www.nasonline.org/site/PageServer?pagename=AWARDS_behavioral_research to http://www.nasonline.org/site/PageServer?pagename=AWARDS_behavioral_research

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

heers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:39, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Napata102 (talk) 22:54, 26 December 2019 (UTC) Someone erased an edit without justification. It is important to note any criticism of a work without entering into arguments otherwise it will appear 'undisputed'. Noting the disagreement does not require adjudicating. Many people are always interested to hear a dissenting opinion to allow them to fully understand a position. So I intend to restore the two references. The person d=editing claimed it was a single source but it was two including a former Princeton Professor![reply]