Talk:Graham–Cassidy health care amendment

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 28 September 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 03:07, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Graham–Cassidy → Graham–Cassidy health care amendment – Makes title more clear, instead of just being the combined name of two senators. If there was a more official name for the amendment, that would probably make most sense as a title (e.x. McCain-Feingold), but since is there none the title should probably at least reference its status as an amendment relating to healthcare. Jw12321 (talk) 19:37, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Per WP:COMMONNAME, it's called "Graham-Cassidy" in most news articles and by most people. Including by Jimmy Kimmel, who called it the "Graham-Cassidy bill"._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 20:56, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support - seems more encyclopedic. Academicoffee71 (talk) 02:33, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Agree that the current title using just two linked surnames seems a little spare, particularly since sources often refer to it as the "Graham-Cassidy bill" (a briefer alternative that I'd also support). ╠╣uw [talk] 10:54, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support - adds clarity. The shorter "Graham-Cassidy" can still be used throughout, but the full title would clarify the page's topic to readers not already familiar enough to rely on a shortened title. Shelbystripes (talk) 04:27, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Alternatively, we could rename it *Graham–Cassidy (health care amendment)*. It keeps it's current name, while the brackets indicate what IT IS. Emass100 (talk) 10:37, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.