Talk:Gracie Barra Combat Team

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Mixed martial arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mixed martial arts concepts, events, and biographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Mixed martial artsWikipedia:WikiProject Mixed martial artsTemplate:WikiProject Mixed martial artsmixed martial arts articles

Martial arts

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Martial arts. Please use these guidelines and suggestions to help improve this article. If you think something is missing, please help us improve them!Martial artsWikipedia:WikiProject Martial artsTemplate:WikiProject Martial artsMartial arts articles

Merge with Gracie Barra

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The result was merge into Gracie Barra Combat Team. -- Unak78 (talk) 11:24, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Academy is the parent organization of the fight team. It would make sense for the information concerning the history and founding of the Academy to be added to the article concerning the team and academy as a whole. Similar setup was required for several other teams.Unak78 19:21, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Merge and redirect. The merged article won't be too big at all. Sancho 04:54, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merging makes sense since Gracie Barra can cover both the organization and the team just as Chute Boxe Academy is listed as one of the teams for instance. Shawnc (talk) 05:15, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Merge

I am no longer going to merge Gracie Barra into this article, but rather this article into the Gracie Barra article owing to the larger subject matter umbrella provided of the title and due to a known redirect already in existence in order to avoid a double re-direct.Unak78 11:58, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]