Talk:Grace of Monaco (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).

European Microstates: Monaco

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European MicrostatesWikipedia:WikiProject European MicrostatesTemplate:WikiProject European MicrostatesEuropean Microstates articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Monaco portal This article is supported by WikiProject Monaco.

Reception

I added a huge section on reception, which was promptly removed. Under the explanation "Removed blog reviews." Now, bloggers are critics that were allowed to review the movie at Cannes. Surely they're allowed to be in the Wiki reception? Also Kidman's role has predominately received praise, why has someone removed 90% of the praise and added in a negative one? That doesn't make it mixed. That means you're manipulating proceedings to make it look mixed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.150.51.8 (talk) 19:12, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I think we need to make a distinction between amateur bloggers and journalists on newspaper "blogs". For example, TheFilmDivider is an amateur blog, where The Playlist at Indiewire is a professional blog. The Telegraph and The Hollywood Reporter aren't blogs, though, so they can be used. As for Kidman's performance, we cannot compile individual reviews to make a general claim. We need a source that says that reviews have collectively praised her performance. We can't reference two or three reviews and make that claim. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 19:27, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

95.150.51.8 and Chocolate Charlie, please discuss the matter here. You can't keep reverting each other, and we have enough content here to come up with a compromise. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 19:54, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why isn't this there then? http://www.indiewire.com/article/cannes-review-nicole-kidman-is-a-solid-grace-kelly-in-grace-of-monaco-but-is-it-fact-or-fiction — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.150.51.8 (talk) 00:50, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Needs links on UK openings added. 213.152.6.214 (talk) 10:43, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

""Kidman's breathless, blank performance does little to add life or credibility to a script..." This feels like half the quote is missing. Just me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.150.51.8 (talk) 07:34, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]