Talk:Grímsvötn

A news item involving Grímsvötn was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 25 May 2011.

Wikipedia

Volcanoes High‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lakes Low‑importance

	Lakes portal Grímsvötn is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Iceland Mid‑importance

	Iceland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iceland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iceland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IcelandWikipedia:WikiProject IcelandTemplate:WikiProject IcelandIceland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that one or more audio files demonstrating correct pronunciation of this article's title be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and included in this article to improve its quality.
Please see Wikipedia:Requested recordings for more on this request.

2010 eruption

Misread NASA Earthwatch page on the 2004 eruption as being on the 2010 eruption. D'oh. Hzoi (talk) 14:54, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

VEI-6??

According to the article, Grímsvötn is a VEI-6 system, but other articles list it as low as 1-3 - see [3] or google Rkarlsba (talk) 15:54, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Correcting myself - it seems there are documentation about a VEI-6 eruption 8230 BC ± 50 years Rkarlsba (talk) 16:08, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note that effusive eruptions are not explosive eruptions I'd suggest the 1783-1785 eruption gets a section in this article with the main being pointed at Laki - that eruption looks to have been in 1783-1785 accorting to Timetable_of_major_worldwide_volcanic_eruptions and here the '1783-1785 Laki fissure eruption: the largest historically known effusive eruption), '^[1] the Laki article describes some pretty major effects from this volcano. Particularly this line The Laki eruption and its aftermath has been estimated to have killed over six million people^[2] globally, making it the deadliest volcanic eruption in historical times.

VEI-6 looks to be in the same sort of scale as Krakatoa - so pretty large and explosive. The last big explosive eruption of the volcano is dated as 8230 BCE ± 50 in this article Volcanic_Explosivity_Index when it had a large explosive eruption, compared to the 1783-85 effusive eruption. The older eruption in 8230 BCE is presumably what generated the caldera ? or does anyone know if the caldera only formed as a result of the 1783-85 effusive eruption? The volcano has a 6x8 km large caldera, whose southern rim is exposed ^[3]

Incidentally a bbc report predicts this eruption will be small and not disrupt air travel much ^[4] EdwardLane (talk) 10:58, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References

2011 Eruption

I have requested temporary full protection on this page, as it has repeated vandalism by non-specialist anons.

This webpage currently has the highest Google hits for Grímsvötn eruptions.

A new article will be needed quite soon, 2011 eruptions of Grímsvötn, anyone want to start a page? In the meantime I will undertake a rapid edit, with relavant scientific links.

I was an editor of 2010 eruptions of Eyjafjallajökull and am trained in glaciology, etc.--Lidos (talk) 07:24, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I copy-pasted and slightly edited in content from All-geo.org but it was deleted (apparently copy-pasting relevant information is not allowed). Especially with the high amount of hits, I still do think though that some sort of comparative analysis between the effects of Eyjafjallajökull and Grímsvötn eruptions (in layman terms!) would be appropriate, at least while the events are unfolding. --NikoN (talk) 08:05, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Let's wait a bit with a new article. When it get too big here, there is enought time to move it. Until that, you could make a redirect to this section to make sure the info lands on the right place. As for temp protection: I see no need yet. There is not much vandalism and it is especially the link between experts and non-experts which makes this encyclopedia a good gneral plublic one! L.tak (talk) 08:50, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, vandalism seems to have ceased. Sorry, NikoN we must avoid text that is copyright, as Wikipedia is very keen on having unique material. One of my edits comparing with the Eyjafjallajökull eruption was also deleted, maybe it can be added later.--Lidos (talk) 19:57, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2010 eruptions of Eyjafjallajökull was created on 24 May 2011 at 16:02, without any announcement on this Talk page.--Lidos (talk) 07:11, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ashfall in Iceland

We need a new section on ashfall in Iceland, chemical composition of the ash, effects on the local community, including the road closures. Compare with the article 2010 eruptions of Eyjafjallajökull. Any offers to start this?--Lidos (talk) 18:30, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Voice Recording

Can someone Icelandic please record a pronunciation of this name? Thanks 79.217.103.127 (talk) 04:51, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not a mp3 but this YouTube video does this. How to pronounce grímsvötn.--Lidos (talk) 07:40, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

glacial floods as subsection in eruption section?

Yesterday I have been bold and placed the glacial flood section in the eruption section. My guess is that the event is not notable for mentioning in the article (as it occurs more often?), except as an indicator of the 2011 eruptions; and I therefore feel it is more suitalbe to place it in a subsection. As the change was reverted, I am asking for input here. L.tak (talk) 21:40, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done -we're 1 week furhter now....- L.tak (talk) 10:11, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Grímsvötn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:31, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2020 earthquakes

Most of this section is irrelevant. These earthquakes happened in a completely different part of Iceland. I am happy to remove this but feel free to convince me otherwise. ABZebra (talk) 11:27, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2021 threat

Added information about September 2021 increased water flow from under the ice cap, as that is a known early warning sign of increased activity. David notMD (talk) 11:06, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[1] [1]

[2] ttp://www.history.com/shows/how-the-earth-was-made/videos#how-the-earth-was-made-iceland

[3] [2]

[4] [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-13488136

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]