Talk:Gråt Fader Berg och spela/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 09:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

This looks like an interesting article. Based on what I can see of the review of Fram med basfiolen, knäpp och skruva, it may be close to GA already. I will start a review shortly. simongraham (talk) 09:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, and I certainly hope so! Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:43, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

The article was created on 12 December and is rated as both a B and C class within different wikiprojects.
- Noted.
The article is relatively short, at 802 words of readable prose.
- Noted.
The lead is of appropriate length at 122 words.
- Thanks.
There are no obvious spelling or grammar errors.
The publication is not mentioned in the body. I suggest adding a relevant paragraph, possibly after the Lyrics. I note that this is also the case in other articles on songs by this artist. The following facts need to the covered:
- The date that it was first published.
  - Added.
- In what publications.
- That it was No.12.
  - Added.
- The subtitle.
  - Added.
- Any further details about the first and subsequent publications.
  - Added.
- I suggest that the sources in your excellent article Fredmans epistlar should furnish most of this.
  - Indeed.
It complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead, layout and word choice.
- Thanks.
Citations seem comprehensive and from reliable sources.
- Noted.
I recommend adding the language= tag to the sources which are not in English.
- Done.
There is no evidence of no original research.
- Noted.
Earwig's Copyvio Detector detects 0% copywrite violation, which is very impressive.
- Noted.
The topic is covered with a neutral point of view.
- Noted.
The article is stable, 100% authored by Chiswick Chap.
- Noted.
Images are public domain and appropriately tagged.
- Noted.
Images have appropriate captions. I recommend adding ALT tags, even though this in not a GA criteria, to the images in the text (the image in the Infobox already has the tag).
- Noted, and added alt texts.

@Chiswick Chap: Please ping me when you would like me to look again. simongraham (talk) 09:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC) @Simongraham: - I think that's all done now. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:41, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiswick Chap: Great work. This article now meets the criteria to be a Good Article.

Pass simongraham (talk) 15:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]