Talk:Government and politics of Vancouver

Vancouver High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Vancouver, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada and the surrounding metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VancouverWikipedia:WikiProject VancouverTemplate:WikiProject VancouverVancouver articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is primarily related to the city of Vancouver

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A summary of this article appears in Vancouver.

I am not a fan of this page

this page seems redundant and awkward. why is there a Mayor subsection? why isn't that stuff covered in the Sam Sullivan? or in Vancouver municipal election, 2005? or in Non-Partisan Association? Also on a slighty different note, why does the Vancouver municipal election, 2005 have a page, and the 2002 election doesn't? 2002 stuff doesn't belong in here. Geedubber 01:34, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, all this stuff used to be on the main Vancouver page. It was taking up way to much room, so it needed to be moved to a new page. That is what I did. Sure, the 2002 election needs a page but I have been too busy to make one. Can you do it? Canuck89 03:29, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IMO, I think a {{main|Sam Sullivan}} would make more sense for the Mayor subsection. Or a {{main|Vancouver municipal election, 2005}}. Or both. Buchanan-H e rmit™..SCREAM!!!..

..

03:57, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree considering those are only short term solutions. There have been many political elections, mayors, scandals, political upsets and actions occur in Vancouver, and there will be many more in the future. This section should comprise a summary of all past and future notable political events in Vancouver. The only unfortunate thing about this article is that it only has events from the last couple of years. Ideally this article should be expanded to give a history of Politics in Vancouver and then include internal links for the reader who wishes to read more about a certain area covered. Mkdw ^talk 01:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Government and politics of Vancouver. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060626065259/http://city.vancouver.bc.ca/ctyclerk/election2005/finalresults.htm to http://www.city.vancouver.bc.ca/ctyclerk/election2005/finalresults.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]