Talk:Goulburn River

	Australia portal Goulburn River is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Opinion verses facts

Paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 of the Overview seem to consist largely of opinion, and not based on fact; the north south pipeline is subject of controversy in the region, esp. in state politics, and the Murray Darling Basin is subject to national political controversy with regard to riparine rights and release of waters. * The Murray Darling, whilst related, is largely a peripheral issue with respect to the Goulburn River.--Whiteguru (talk) 00:43, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The section heading has today been changed from Overview to River quality. The section has been tagged {{ref improve}}. Please help if you can. Thanks. Rangasyd (talk) 08:47, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 10:44, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Goulburn River (Victoria) → Goulburn River – The Victorian river is clearly the primary topic - longest river of Victoria, passes through major agricultural area etc. Readers looking for the NSW river will still only require one click—through a hat-note—to reach their article. Mattinbgn (talk) 22:34, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Seems reasonable. --Bduke (Discussion) 23:14, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'd never heard of the NSW river till now. Moondyne (talk) 01:27, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ I'm currently sitting around 500 metres from the Victorian version of the river, and feel somewhat connected, but I see no reason to belittle the NSW version. It has a national park associated with it, which is how I came to know about it. It just happens to travel through less populated country, but that doesn't make it less important. HiLo48 (talk) 05:51, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your grounds for objection. It is not about "belittling" and has little to do with "importance". WP:PRIMARYTOPIC states: "A topic is primary for a term, with respect to usage, if it is highly likely—much more likely than any other topic, and more likely than all the other topics combined—to be the topic sought when a reader searches for that term." This is the case here, is it not?. There is no proposal to change the article title for the NSW river—which will remain at Goulburn River (New South Wales)—and it will remain one click away from the common name, just through a hatnote rather than a disambiguation page. The NSW river's status is untouched. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 06:10, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK HiLo48 (talk) 20:23, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Goulburn River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:12, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Goulburn River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080719164235/http://mdbc.gov.au/__data/page/2260/34373_MDBC_SRA_Report_Web.pdf to http://www.mdbc.gov.au/__data/page/2260/34373_MDBC_SRA_Report_Web.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:52, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]