Jump to content

Talk:Gottfried Schloemer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleGottfried Schloemer was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 8, 2021Good article nomineeListed
February 26, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 7, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Gottfried Schloemer (pictured with car) is considered by some to have built the first practical gasoline automobile in the United States?
Current status: Delisted good article


[edit]

Do we have an issue number for this? Volume 100 (I think) ran from January to June 1922, so that is six possible page 21s.

Popular Science had its archives online [1], and I can get hits back for volume 101 with random queries, but nothing for volume 100; so unfortunately it looks like they haven't uploaded that yet.

It would be nice to get the full article (and any title and/or byline). Presumably it's from January or Febuary, inspired by Schloemer's then very recent passing; but at the moment all I can see is just the snippet from Google. Jheald (talk) 18:30, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to be May 1922, Vol 100, No. 5, page 25.
Just asked the Library of Congress for a copy of the article America's First Automobile - and its giant offspring!
http://books.google.com/books?id=OI5JAAAAYAAJ&pg=RA4-PA25&dq=Gottfried+Schloemer+Popular+Science&hl=en&ei=xJQDTrHaIcGcgQfk7tXpDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Gottfried%20Schloemer%20Popular%20Science&f=false
I assume you mean above article. Am I right? Hit the refresh button if it doesn't come in the first time.--Doug Coldwell talk 19:45, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Not sure how you knew it was May, but those two bits clearly fit together sequentially. Shame a bit of the scan has got blanked just after that -- possibly a sign that a picture has been deleted. A little more can be squeezed from the text search at Google Books:

From this inventor's crude "freak" of 33 years ago — the probable progenitor of the modern high powered motor car — has developed a gigantic industry in which $1204378642 of capital is invested. The amazing industry has grown too fast ...

and (column 3):

The giant progeny that grew from Steering wheel, radiator, and pneumatic tires were unknown when Gottfried Schloemer's "horseless buggy" appeared intake. And that was only 30 years ago. Today the auto industry is so vast that it is hard to comprehend. In the United States alone are registered 9000000 pleasure cars and 1000000 tracks. If these cars formed a procession, radiators against rear wheels, the line would extend over 16000 miles. Half the population of the country could go auto riding at once, for 6000000000 passengers, as compared with 1235000000 ...

but beyond that seems to be unobtainable -- at least not from Google, though I expect the LoC will be more help. 22:01, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
Library of Congress has ordered that from their stacks. The librarian will scan it probably Monday or Tuesday and send me a clear PDF image. Send me an e-mail and when I get this article I'll forward the PDF to you so you can see the article clearly. How I got the exact issue number was by scrolling up (top scroll button) to the top pages (about five +/-) until I got the cover page (with a picture of Edison). --Doug Coldwell talk 22:14, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That makes sense. I don't get a scroll-bar, just an unscrollable snippet. I think it's a U.S./non-U.S. copyright thing from Google. Jheald (talk) 22:17, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1889 or 1892 ?

[edit]

I'm getting a bit confused as to whether the machine first ran in 1889 or 1892 ?

Most of our article suggests 1889; but some sources say 1892, for example Geisst (2006) that we quote in the article.

The Milwaukee Public Museum has a picture on Flickr [2] with a caption that includes "Schloemer later stated that his motor vehicle first ran in 1892."

I haven't yet been able to lay my hands on the 1983 version of Britannica we quote in our article as saying that Schloemer built the car in 1890. But this is what I have so far found in current versions of Britannica. A current online edition, in an article "History of the automobile > Development of the gasoline car > The United States" has:

Most authorities credit Charles E. Duryea and J. Frank Duryea with creating the first successful American gasoline-powered automobile, in 1892–93...

The Duryea was certainly not the first American-built road vehicle. A number of steam carriages had been built after Oliver Evans's first example (see above The age of steam). Nor was the Duryea the first American internal-combustion automobile. Sephaniah Reese, a machinist in Plymouth, Pa., built a graceful gasoline-powered tricycle believed by historians to have been completed in 1887. Henry Nadig, another Pennsylvania inventor, completed a vehicle and tested it in 1891, the same year as John William Lambert of Ohio City, Ohio, and Charles Black of Indianapolis, Ind.; William T. Harris of Baltimore and Gottfried Schloemer of Milwaukee, Wis., built successful cars in 1892.

while the current (2010) print version of "Britannica", which no longer has an article "Automobile", has under "Transportation > The rise of the automobile > Early efforts in the United States":

"Despite this many historians are convinced that Duryea was not the first U.S. internal-combustion automobile and that this distinction should be assigned to a gasoline-driven, single-cylinder car built in 1890 and run in 1891 by John William Lambert of Ohio City, Ohio."

Our article on the Lambert gasoline buggy also has a quote, from what may be even yet another version of Britannica:

"The magazine Antique Automobile, after five years of investigation, announced its conviction that the Duryea Brothers had not been the first United States internal combustion automobile, and that this distinction should be assigned to a car built in 1890 and run in 1891 by John William Lambert of Ohio City, Ohio."

-- though it's not clear (at least, not just from that) what the rules of engagement for the Antique Automobile investigation were. The wording at the top of our page on the Lambert buggy calls it the "first practical gasoline automobile available for sale in America". If that was the criterion used, it would not be incompatible with Schloemer having run his car in 1890, but not getting it into production.

A google book hit here also names James F. Hill and George Brayton as early pioneers, saying that Richard P. Scharchburg carried out extensive research into them. But I see that Brayton was primarily the creator of an engine; as for James F. Hill, he built a steam buggy that was at some point converted to gasoline [3] but I haven't seen a date for that conversion yet.

As for the 1892 date, I'm imagining the confusion may be because that was the year that Schloemer did start to make concrete plans to get his machine into production (even if they came to nothing). The timeline given by the 1921 Milwaukee magazine (cited) seems sufficiently detailed to give the 1889/1890 dates a high degree of plausibility.

But I'm wondering whether we can confirm this with the Museum, and/or whether there are any really bulletproof assessments that really analyse the primary evidence? Can anyone lay hands on the 1960 Antique Automobile article? Jheald (talk) 18:30, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just sent off an e-mail to the museum about this. I originally contacted them in May and they said to contact them again in late June when their expert on this gets back. I'll be glad to send you a copy of this or a copy of their response, which I suspect will be in about a week. Just e-mail me if you want.--Doug Coldwell talk 18:57, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Just received this back: Carter Lupton is out of the office until Monday, June 27. --Doug Coldwell talk 19:02, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gottfried Schloemer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:35, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Gottfried Schloemer/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 12:52, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:52, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress

[edit]
  • Add a serial comma after "mechanical engineer".
  •  Done
  • "lived on the south" → "lived in the south"
  •  Done
  • Add alt text and upright to every image.
  •  Done
  • "birthplace of first" → "birthplace of the first"
  •  Done
  • "farm land" should be written as one word.
  •  Done
  • "a few of years" → "a few years"
     Done
  • "Mid life" should be written as one word.
     Done
  • Add a comma after "In this buggy".
     Done
  • "home-made" → "homemade"
     Done
  • "naptha" → "naphtha"
     Done
  • "as a fuel" → "as fuel"
     Done
  • "in the later part" - reword
     Done
  • "Schloemer with first" → "Schloemer with the first"
     Done
  • Add a hyphen between "mass produce".
     Done
  • "horeless" - typo?
     Done
  • "Arizonia Republic" - typo?
     Done
  • Add a hyphen between "gasoline driven" (both times).
     Done
  • "achievement. [34]" → "achievement.[34]"
     Done
  • Remove the comma after "made in 1896".
     Done
  • Add a comma after "Schlöemer's death".
     Done
  • "furore" - typo?
     Done
  • Sort categories in alphabetical order.
     Done

Comments

[edit]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment

[edit]

This article is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 and the Good article (GA) drive to reassess and potentially delist over 200 GAs that might contain copyright and other problems. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of articles en masse, unless a reviewer opens an independent review and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information about the GA status of this article, the timeline and process for delisting, and suggestions for improvements. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gottfried_Schloemer&oldid=1146759523"