Talk:Gothic War (535–554)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 15:36, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

I'll start this in a few days. auntieruth (talk) 15:36, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

needs a bit more of an edit....missing verbs, etc. I've done some tweaking here. Note needs a citation. auntieruth (talk) 16:30, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

@Auntieruth55: How embarrassing. I thought that I had reviewed that before GANing it. Many apologies, now done. Regardless, I shall have another trawl through it tomorrow. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:56, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

@Gog the Mild: much better. I made some additional tweaks here. Please review. auntieruth (talk) 16:36, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

@Auntieruth55: As ever I am impressed by the way that you manage to improve the prose of what I (foolishly) think is already a reasonably written article. I need to acquire that touch. I have tweaked the wording of two of your changes. In both cases to stay closer to what the sources say; in one to additionally make things, IMO, a bit clearer. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:47, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: