Jump to content

Talk:Gothenburg Study of Children with DAMP

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

This article arose from a section of the article on Christopher Gillberg. There was a long discussion about the section in that article.  —Daphne A 10:37, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you finally put it in a separate article :-)
Fred-Chess 21:52, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I just hadn't thought of it until you recommended it.  —Daphne A 04:50, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the title of this article: the study was done by the Gillberg group, and it was not initially (or ever entirely) about DAMP; so the original title is more appropriate. I ask that the title not be changed without having some discussion first.  —Daphne A 04:50, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the material that I removed from the start of the article was good material, which it would be nice to include. The problem was that there were no sources.  —Daphne A 05:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the title of this article, the study was done by several researchers and clinicians, and not just Gillberg. It was about children with DAMP as descirbed in my version of the article. Initially the term MBD was used instead of the term DAMP.--Denis Diderot 06:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This title should be OK, IMO. / Fred-Chess 18:07, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Correct fact?

[edit]

Eva Kärfve and Leif Elinder wrote letters to Gothenburg University where they accused Gillberg and Rasmussen of scientific misconduct. At which date did they write a letter? Or did they write two letters separetly? A source would be nice for this statement. Ulner 19:54, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Gothenburg Study of Children with DAMP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:39, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on The Gothenburg Study of Children with DAMP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:51, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]