Talk:Gotha G.V

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Aviation / Technology / Weaponry / European / German / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War I task force

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Untitled

Bold texterr... how come there's no photo of a gotha? I'd like to know what it looks like from the outside.

here, here and here are some nice pictures of the G.IV. No idea of their copyright status though. Bastie 23:21, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Per Article 72 of German copyright law, the copyright on photos expires 50 years after they've been published, or 50 years after their creation if they haven't been published (http://www.iuscomp.org/gla/statutes/UrhG.htm#I). That would make them public domain in Germany, since they weren't published until more than 50 years after creation. Since copyright in the country of publication is expired, they're in the public domain in the US. If one were to argue that they were actually first published in the US, then the copyright would expire 70 years after death, or 2010 in this case. Dabarkey 19:06, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I got so excited when I actually found a cockpit shot, which is rare for these old planes! But I agree, we need an outside picture. I think the pics provided by Bastie are cool, and I can't imagine them being in copyright any longer. FranksValli 06:19, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia also needs an article on its big brother, the Zeppelin-Staaken "Gigant". Biggest wooden airplane until the Spruce Goose, but its been completely forgotten. Bastie 11:38, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to Buckboard, an article on the Zeppelin Staaken R.VI now exists. Bastie 22:55, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added all of the technical specs I compiled for a 4th-Year Aerospace course. I agree that more photos would be excellent. I suspect that the owner of the this page [1] would be willing to release to the public domain if asked. (As he has already indeciated that that was his reason for creating the page int he first place) Supasheep 7:05, Jan 30, 2006 (UTC)

any left?

are there any of these aricraft still in existance?101.117.71.231 (talk) 06:38, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rear gunner

The article talks about "expanding" the Gotha Tunnel and goes on about "providing a slot in the upper fuselage that allowed the rear gunner to remain stationary." – I don't understand what is meant by that. I can only imagine that the original tunnel was done away and replaced with some kind of hole arrangement whereby the same MG that could fire aft and high was now able to fire aft and low as well. Is that more or less what went on? Please rewrite. --BjKa (talk) 12:52, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]