Talk:Goshainganj railway station

India: Uttar Pradesh / Railways / Transport Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Uttar Pradesh (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Transport in India workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Goshainganj railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120605120826/http://www.indiantrains.org/station-details/?code=GGJ&name=GOSHAINGANJ to http://www.indiantrains.org/station-details/?code=GGJ&name=GOSHAINGANJ

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:30, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discrimination

If i write a new delhi in hindi language you remove it , why you not removing the other languages written in many Wikipedia pages. I can give you many examples where the famous language is also written. I requesting you to please remove the names in others languages in many Wikipedia pages. Then i understand that you are a not discrimination in people. I know i have written good and correct details but . You have just one work only to remove the knowledge. Anuragtiwarimumbai (talk) 09:58, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Anuragtiwarimumbai: Wikipedia has its own rules and policies, according to which we cannot use Hindi or any other Indian script in India related articles, except articles on languages and scripts. Go through WP:NOINDICSCRIPT policy. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:32, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Common name

Faizabad is not the common name of Ayodhya district . Ayodhya know every people in the world and faizabad don't know in Uttar pradesh . Ayodhya is also the official name of Ayodhya district. I know very well what i am writing, i don't want to teach from outsider who dont know about our cities and district's names. I do hard work to write correct details and you just remove it . Dont tell me the common name, real name and official name. I feel you understand my knowledge. I am a well educated to write correct information. Anuragtiwarimumbai (talk) 10:07, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Anuragtiwarimumbai: Again Wikipedia has its own rules and policies, according to WP:COMMONNAME policy, the name of the district is still Faizabad district, see its talk page. Also the same is for Allahabad, see its talk page too. These were not moved to Ayodhya district and Prayagraj. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:32, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please show my information into the page

If another editor is writing wrong details then why you want to tell me to that I am doing wrong thing I am doing everything correct and the other editor if you say that he is correct he is not correct I am correct and please publish my details onto the page and don't remove it.few minutes ago what I am written on the page you should publish it onto the article I am doing only correct information publishing. Don't irritate me. You have not knowledge of India and Indian people. so don't do this Anuragtiwarimumbai (talk) 12:11, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Anuragtiwarimumbai: Wikipedia has its own rules and policies, that dictates the format on the articles. People of India or any other country has nothing to do with it. I'm only telling you to follow those rules, WP:COMMONNAME being that. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:20, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]