Talk:Gorenstein scheme
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Both "Residues and duality" and The stacks project do not agree with this definition (both say a scheme is Gorenstein if all of its local rings are Gorenstein). Who is right?
- Thank you for the info. I checked the stack project and they require a Gorenstein scheme to be Cohen-Macaulay (this requirement is undesirable since it would be consistent with Q-Gorenstein,) I have added a note to the article. -- Taku (talk) 21:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)