This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
I see lots of unsubstantiated peacock terms in this article; 'leading' gets thrown around a lot, an article of his is described as 'one of the single most important references', 'influential' is used to describe his Scientific American articles, his books are labelled 'classic', etc. Examining the history of the article, all constructive edits trace to the physics department at University of Michigan, where Kane works. It seems likely that a person or persons affiliated with him in some way are the sole contributors to this article. Reading the rest of the article, references are obviously lacking for many claims and there are some dubious statements like '...have shown that scalar superpartners should have masses of order tens of TeV', which I imagine many would not agree with without qualifiers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.2.82.207 (talk) 04:34, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The UM contributor obviously wants to advertise Kane's books as well judging by the original text they appended to two of the books listed (now removed):
Particle Garden -- the Standard Model of Particle Physics for any curious person
.jpg){kind=small}
