Talk:Goosebumps Series 2000

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Goosebumps Series 2000 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Novels

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

You know, the earlier goosebumps books where just cheesy and harmless horror stories. But I think the 2000 series was much more trying to reach to the 16-18 demographic, as some of it was rather adult ("balls-to-the-wall", one might say). Does anyone think this is worth mentioning? - Another n00b (talk) 22:46, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Only if you can find a comment to that effect from a reliable source, otherwise it counts as original research. DS (talk) 13:35, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can each of the books receive its own article? If they aren't considered notable enough, what can I do to make them notable?`20:58, 10 January 2015 (UTC)2602:306:C541:CC60:E142:4F85:E60C:1047 (talk)

They need to meet the notability criteria for books. If we were to create articles on all the books, they would consist mainly of a plot summary. That would be unnecessary, considering this article already contains a plot summary of all the books. Fearstreetsaga (talk) 17:55, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]