Talk:Google Safe Browsing

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Google Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoogleWikipedia:WikiProject GoogleTemplate:WikiProject GoogleGoogle articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Google To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles for most of the other products listed here and here.
Assess : All articles in the Category:Unknown-importance Google articles and Category:Unassessed Google articles using the project's assessment scale
Expand : Google Mapathon, Google Talkback
Maintain : This WikiProject
Merge : Google mobile services into List of Google products
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class Google articles and Category:Google stubs
Update : List of features in Android and Gmail interface#Product integration. Update logos of Google Marketing Platform products
Other :
- Add more stuff to this to do list if you like! (click here...)
- create:
- Help the Google article for a good article status
- Improve the Outline of Google
- Get more members using :
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Google/Invite Members}}
- Infobox Images with transparent areas needing a different background color

Computer Security: Computing Start‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Start

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Privacy?

Isn't this an enormous invasion of the user's privacy? I haven't looked into it, but I read this and I'm surprised nothing about privacy is in the article or even on this Talk page... --82.170.113.123 (talk) 23:57, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quotes:

"It's a time capsule on anyone who ever did anything in Chrome or Firefox ... they can be de-anonymized way after the fact, months or years after using those browsers and the settings are turned off," Hansen says.

And the cookie can be used to identify the IP addresses he or she visits, for instance.

"Ultimately, any time they store any kind of information on the browser and echo it back to the Internet, there is a potential leak of user's privacy."

But a Google spokesperson said IP addresses and cookies are not combined with data from other services, nor used for tracking. "All such data is deleted after two weeks" and not anonymized, the spokesperson said.

This article is awfully written. It just doesn't make any sense. There is no risk analysis, nothing. Only a bunch of words. Could as well be the words of a politician!

And yes, we need a section on privacy here. --WPcorrector (talk) 05:34, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Section started J05HYYY (talk) 01:50, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for starting this important section. It would be interesting to specify which implementations use the API in such a privacy-invasive way. Mozilla Firefox for instance doesn't seem to tell Google about the visited websites, instead it queries a local database: [1] [2] (I don't know how up to date those articles are, but I still see relevant configuration settings in about:config for Firefox 53.0.3). The option to query Google for every URL was removed in Firefox 3, AFAICT. --Nemo 11:58, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There's been some research on the privacy of Safe Browsing independent of Google such as this paper. It would be great if this section drew more on independent research rather than Google's own claims. --Suhacker256 (talk) 18:22, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Listing of google.com on Safe Browsing

Google's own results for google.com and their lack of being therefore listed as suspicious seems, well, suspicious

What is the current listing status for google.com?

   This site is not currently listed as suspicious.

   Part of this site was listed for suspicious activity 20 time(s) over the past 90 days.

What happened when Google visited this site?

   Of the 1389615 pages we tested on the site over the past 90 days, 1198 page(s) resulted in malicious software being downloaded and installed without user consent. The last time Google visited this site was on 2013-11-27, and the last time suspicious content was found on this site was on 2013-11-27.

   Malicious software includes 248 trojan(s), 243 exploit(s), 126 scripting exploit(s). Successful infection resulted in an average of 5 new process(es) on the target machine.

   Malicious software is hosted on 175 domain(s), including earnmoneydo.com/, gilmoregirlspodcast.com/, markforge.biz/.

   121 domain(s) appear to be functioning as intermediaries for distributing malware to visitors of this site, including journaldugeek.com/, x-cornerz.com/, thepullbox.com/.

   This site was hosted on 3 network(s) including AS15169 (GOOGLE), AS43515 (YOUTUBE), AS1221 (TELSTRA).

Has this site acted as an intermediary resulting in further distribution of malware?

   Over the past 90 days, google.com appeared to function as an intermediary for the infection of 61 site(s) including carleton.ca/, realmomkitchen.com/, bit.ly/.

Has this site hosted malware?

   Yes, this site has hosted malicious software over the past 90 days. It infected 33 domain(s), including joomfa.org/, burguscircus.free.fr/, philkearnycwrt.org/.

-- comment of 50.133.134.194 made on article instead of discussion page --WPcorrector (talk) 04:49, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Booke site visit

Booke site visit 1.39.232.39 (talk) 14:02, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]