Talk:Google.org

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Google High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoogleWikipedia:WikiProject GoogleTemplate:WikiProject GoogleGoogle articles

High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Google To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles for most of the other products listed here and here.
Assess : All articles in the Category:Unknown-importance Google articles and Category:Unassessed Google articles using the project's assessment scale
Expand : Google Mapathon, Google Talkback
Maintain : This WikiProject
Merge : Google mobile services into List of Google products
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class Google articles and Category:Google stubs
Update : List of features in Android and Gmail interface#Product integration. Update logos of Google Marketing Platform products
Other :
- Add more stuff to this to do list if you like! (click here...)
- create:
- Help the Google article for a good article status
- Improve the Outline of Google
- Get more members using :
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Google/Invite Members}}
- Infobox Images with transparent areas needing a different background color

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Elizabeth.guterson.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:33, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Google Foundation vs. Google.org

These are two seperate entities. The Google Foundation is a not-for-profit organization with an endowment of $90 million. Google.org, however, is a "for profit charity", probably one of the first of its kind, with $1 billion seed money from Google. These are both very different beasts and as such should be considered seperately. At the same time, this article is currently very inaccurate because its considering the two things as one, and I'll attempt to fix that. --Tedivm 07:24, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article seems to have been fixed

The article seems to only contain information partaining to google.org now.

1 billion dollars

need a source for that piece of data, it was reported in the new york times online, but that can only be read by members so it does not serve as a good source. If you can find a refrence please cite it.

Actually, Google gave Google.org 3 million shares of stock during their IPO. That has a current market value of around $2 billion, but will fluctuate over time. It's not clear how much of that stock has been sold, but I doubt it's much considering they've only donated around $15 million so far. Source:

http://google.org/about.html

They also donate 1% of profits every year, which is around $63 million for the last 4 quarters.Drake 19:27, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing the merge

The merge of Google Foundation into the accompanying article simply added the body text of the foundation article as the text of a section of Google.org, making no effort to justify its inclusion there or eliminate repetitive language. I've refactored the existing text & added new material, drawing on

http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/10/12/HNgooglephilanthropy_1.html (October 12, 2005)

http://www.google.org/foundation.html 2007

http://www.irc.nl/page/26539 2005 (source for both the $90M and the $1B)

This Gregory Miller is probably not the same financial guy of that name who's w/ SunTrust Banks, Inc. Per http://www.port-of-charleston.com/SCITC/documents/2007_gregory_miller.pdf (I relied on Google's HTML version: http://www.port-of-charleston.com/SCITC/documents/2007_gregory_miller.pdf) :

Gregory Miller is First Vice President and Chief Economist with SunTrust Bank, Inc. He completed his undergraduate and graduate Economics degrees at Florida State University and has been a practicing economist, forecaster, and teacher for over 20 years.

--Jerzy•t 06:20 &06:25, 16 August 2007 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Googledotorg.gif

Image:Googledotorg.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:27, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

I think there should be a section about the leadership of google.org, and the paragraph, "The director from 2006 until 2009 was Dr. Larry Brilliant.[11] Upon stepping down, Brilliant was replaced by Megan Smith, Google's Vice-President of new business development, and the organization began focusing on creating engineering solutions to global problems with projects such as Google Flu Trends and Crisis Response, an effort to respond to natural disasters.[12] Megan Smith later left to join the office of the CTO under the Obama administration, at which point Google.org began focusing exclusively on its charitable giving initiatives under the stewardship of Jacquelline Fuller, who currently runs the organization" should go there, not be mixed in with the "Previous initiatives" section.

The article should also mention how google.org has worked and is working with the #BLM founders, as Justin Steele talked about in class. Also, make sure to update all the numbers, about how much google.org has donated.

I also agree that there should be a section distinguishing google.com from google.org! I think a lot of people get the two confused, and so this section would be really helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elizabeth.guterson (talk • contribs) 23:23, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Google.org. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:51, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]