Talk:Goody's Powder

"Goody's Powder is mixed in water and ingested as a drink.[2][3] The perceived benefit of delivering pain reliever in this form is that it provides faster pain relief because it does not need to be dissolved by the digestive system (as a tablet would) before entering the bloodstream. However, the very acidic taste and awkwardness of ingesting the powder are often displeasurable." - Many of us simply pour the powder in their mouth and then wash it down with a drink. We find it to be quicker and less displeasurable that way. NightBear (talk) 16:11, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a published source that can be cited to indicate that some/many users ingest it this way? --Orlady (talk) 16:59, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. In fact, the Goody's website claims that taking it by putting it onto your tongue first before swallowing is "the most popular technique". Rufwork (talk) 02:21, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ingredient ratio information

A suggestion. Information on the compounding with regard to effectiveness would be of interest. A 1:1 ratio of acet and aspirin is common. I wonder how / why they came up with 1:2? 50.104.96.249 (talk) 09:43, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Goody's Powder. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120415192244/http://blogs.newsobserver.com/business/gsk-sells-bc-goodys-and-other-brands to http://blogs.newsobserver.com/business/gsk-sells-bc-goodys-and-other-brands

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:07, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion

This article should normally be merged into Aspirin/paracetamol/caffeine per MOS:PHARM, but this might give undue weight to Goodie's Powder there. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 11:37, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: I have not been involved with the MOS:PHARM (style guide) but if "Goodie's" (Goody's?) is a major player or totally involved there is a direct connection. However, per a discussion here and the "style guide" of using the "International nonproprietary name", even if more generic, is different from "Brands". If there is evidence Goody's should be "merged" it would seem that Prestige Brands would be the far more likely target.

Short of creating a Aspirin/paracetamol/caffeine brand names article, which I found really helpful (and I may look into) when I ran across Ibuprofen brand names. As a brand the name seems to have self-notability (initial observation), as almost every store I go into in the US has them as a point-of-sale system (cash wrap or cash well), and it has been splashed world-wide as a sponsor. My main issue with this article is the advertising tone.

A lack of any "Adverse effects", "side effects", "drug Interactions", or some sort of "warning" section is lacking or intentionally left out, that is in the requested target article. Any such information is important. The article buries a source "Headache Remedy Recalled Over Fatal Tampering", to inline cite, "The company also produced other medicinal products, including throat sprays and throat lozenges.". The end result is "Goody's is good". Aspirin in powder form alone be a good reason for a stomach warning.

This article is titled "Goody's Powder" but is overshadowed (other than primary sources) by Goody's "Race sponsorship". This might be a good title for another article but taking that out would severely lesson any "undue weight" if merged or left stand-alone.

I have not come to the conclusion that a merge is not in order. This article is better sourced than BC Powder which only has two references (also owned by Prestige as well as "BC Cherry" and "BC Arthritis" Formula), that now only contains aspirin/caffeine (no article?) but I remember when Salicylamide (similar to aspirin) was included. I suppose there would be no need for a aspirin/caffeine/Salicylamide article.

Should it be merged? I would lean that "as is", yes. Can it be fixed, possibly. Merging a lot of separate "Brands" (especially under-sourced) to a better parent company article would seem (still initial observation) a better solution. I will have to look closer. Otr500 (talk) 14:51, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merge on the grounds that the Goody's Powder is about the brand and company history rather than therapeutic use. It's also prominently linked to the Aspirin/paracetamol/caffeine page. As a brand, MOS:TM is the relevant manual of style. Klbrain (talk) 08:55, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Closing, given that this objection has been uncontested for 4 months. Klbrain (talk) 17:05, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]