Talk:Good Enough (Evanescence song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Melicans (talk · contribs · count) 23:56, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   I see lots of linking of common terms. Per WP:OVERLINK, country names (Hungary) and common objects (mirror, diary, bookcase, etc.) shouldn't be linked. Beware of contractions that aren't in quotes. I've removed a few instances of both but there are more in there. Also, you shouldn't have a section with just one subsection (in this case, Controversy). There should be no subsections or 2+, but not one.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   When you say it was scheduled for release in 2011, do you mean 2007?

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   'Controversy' is an inherent violation of WP:NPOV, and there isn't really any controversial about it either. It might be simplest to just remove the subsection heading; it won't affect/disrupt the flow at all.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   File:Ge-caption.jpg needs an improved fair use rationale. It's not enough to say that it helps the reader; it helps in what way? What makes it indispensible? You can relate it commentary, criticism, production, etc, but it does need some sort of rationale.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Holding for improvements to be made. Melicans (talk, contributions) 23:56, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

• Is it good enough now? My love is love (talk) 00:09, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Yes, it looks excellent. Great work! :-) Melicans (talk, contributions) 00:24, 4 October 2011 (UTC)