Talk:Goo.gl

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Google

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoogleWikipedia:WikiProject GoogleTemplate:WikiProject GoogleGoogle articles

WikiProject Google To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles for most of the other products listed here and here.
Assess : All articles in the Category:Unknown-importance Google articles and Category:Unassessed Google articles using the project's assessment scale
Expand : Google Mapathon, Google Talkback
Maintain : This WikiProject
Merge : Google mobile services into List of Google products
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class Google articles and Category:Google stubs
Update : List of features in Android and Gmail interface#Product integration. Update logos of Google Marketing Platform products
Other :
- Add more stuff to this to do list if you like! (click here...)
- create:
- Help the Google article for a good article status
- Improve the Outline of Google
- Get more members using :
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Google/Invite Members}}
- Infobox Images with transparent areas needing a different background color

goo.gl article redirection

Why does this Wikipedia article for goo.gl redirect to the general article on URL shortening? It seems inappropriate, partly because only five sentences in that entire article are actually about goo.gl, and partly because it conflates - or at least gives the impression of conflating - URL shortening with the goo.gl service, which is far from being reality. Nmgyrl (talk) 17:14, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is especially bad for the goo.gl link that is listed at the end of the URL shortening article. I believe that no article should link back to itself via redirect, so I'm being bold and change the redirect target to Google. Eventually creating a proper article might be the better long-term alternative. --91.56.224.164 (talk) 23:07, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is way worse. "Goo.gl" refers to a URL shortening service. "Google" is a massive company and its articles doesn't even mention the URL shortening service. Redirecting there is just wrong. There's more than one article that links here, and all of them expect this page to discuss the URL shortening service.

I think goo.gl should redirect to URL shortening, and in fact I will revert it as such. The URL shortening article simply should not link back here if we want to avoid it linking to itself. But yes, writing this article would be better. --NeatNit (talk) 11:00, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]