Talk:Gon (manga)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gon (manga) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Godzilla connection
[edit]was there any connection ever made between GON and GOZILLA? in one episode he was hit by lightning and not only gon survived but was able to electrocute others after that. he is like mr.bean. a weird alien unaffected by earthly elements and events. so gon could be godzilla in his childhood. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.50.165.66 (talk) 05:03, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Untitled
[edit]Um, I'm not a wikipedia aficianado, but I have to say I think it's really sad that the one single Gon page on wikipedia is only half devoted to Tanaka's art, and the rest is about a character in a video game. Even the picture is from Tekken and not from Gon! Gon is a comic, a work of art. It has been analyzed by various critical literary sources and it is widely known among readers of comics and graphic novels. The video game reference really only belongs in the trivia section. It is an entirely different milieu. If it's important to have information about the Gon character in Tekken, then there should be two pages; one part of the cvg project devoted to the character, and one devoted to the actual books.
Major Character?
[edit]Gon is listed as being a major character and Dr B is not? I really dont think that should be so. Gon was a gimmick throw away character in T# whilst Doctor B has impacted the Tekken cannon over and over again. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cosmic Larva (talk • contribs) 01:09, 19 March 2007 (UTC).
I have a question that I had
[edit]Has something happened to the movie? The phrasing "was due for release in 2009" suggests that it is no longer so scheduled. Either the "was" needs changed to an "is," or something needs to be added to clarify why it is no longer coming out in 2009. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.216.185.216 (talk) 22:07, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
SNES game
[edit]I would argue against calling the Gon SNES game Mario-like. Other than also being a platformer, and on a Nintendo system, the game has nothing in common with either the classic 2d, or the modern 3d Mario games. The game does not share particularly similar art styles, game-play, or any other readily identifiable features with Mario games, both of the era, and not. It could just as soon be compared to Sonic the Hedgehog, which would perhaps be more accurate, though I would argue against that as well. I would say that the paragraph in question should just mention it as a platformer, without comparing it to any other games (a similar one to which I am unfamiliar), but that would make that second sentence a little short wouldn't it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.41.42.31 (talk) 15:08, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Reviews
[edit]--Gabriel Yuji (talk) 03:08, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gon (manga). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927235258/http://www.spritee.com/news/GONRelease071305.pdf to http://www.spritee.com/news/GONRelease071305.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:29, 20 October 2017 (UTC)