Talk:Gonçalo Coelho

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Brazil: History Mid‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the History of Brazil task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Portugal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

Untitled

1501, 1502 etc. The Expeditions. About Coelho(and Amerigo Vespucci description) voyage of 1501 and 1502: To River Plate/Argentina and Falklands/Malvinas or Georgia - description of bays very similar to ones of Magellan in south Patagonia 17 years after and of Islands to 52º south latitude and Icebergs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.113.163.75 (talk) 20:07, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can tell you for a fact his expeditions did not reach the River Plate or the Falkland Islands/South Georgia. See Morison (1974), Southern Voyages. Jonas Poole (talk) 00:57, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Current edit war about sentence involving Amerigo Vespucci

There seems to be a current edit war about whether the following sentence should be in the article:

If Amerigo Vespucci`s account is to be believed, the expedition reached the latitude "South Pole elevation 52º [S]", in the ''cold'' latitudes of present day [[Patagonia]], reaching ''inhospitable seas and shores'' (or ''islands''), before turning back, but this is still a matter of controversy.<ref>[http://icaadocs.mfah.org/icaadocs/THEARCHIVE/FullRecord/tabid/88/doc/839287/language/en-US/Default.aspx] The Invention of America. Indiana University Press. pp. 106–107, by Edmundo O'Gorman</ref>

SHFW8989 has deleted this content a total of four times so far. C.Fred, Parsecboy, and myself have each reverted this deletion once.

I propose that the sentence should stay in the article, since it includes the statement that the account is "still a matter of controversy". APerson (talk!) 03:03, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the editor is a sock of a banned user - there's no issue to discuss. Parsecboy (talk) 09:49, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]