Talk:Golosov Ravine

Russia: Visual arts / History / Physical geography / Religion / Demographics & ethnography Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the visual arts in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the physical geography of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the religion in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the demographics and ethnography of Russia task force.

Neopaganism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neopaganism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neopaganism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeopaganismWikipedia:WikiProject NeopaganismTemplate:WikiProject NeopaganismNeopaganism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On Veles, and on St. George myths

There was an edit removing the info about St. George-related interpretation of these stones (which seems to be quite widespread, at least in the press), as well as about the wooden chapel. I have reverted it to the previous edit. Indeed, I failed to find a reference for this one, but I definitely read about it somewhere, if I'm not mistaken, in a context of history of local icons. Also the relation of the name "Golos" to "Veles" seems to be a rather known thing.

Please, generally, if you don't like these myths and find them "incorrect", create a subsection, and explain, why they are incorrect. If everybody write that "Golosov" and "Volosov" means "related to Veles" - it worth to be mentioned. If it is incorrect, please, write, why it is incorrect, and what is the correct toponymy for this name. Thank you. Khakhalin (talk) 17:06, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added more links (including a link to an article mentioning the wooden chapel), and framed the "veneration" part in a somewhat more critical vein. I hope it will help. If anybody wishes to describe the current practices and the history of the question in an even more academic manner however, you are always welcome to create subsections. Khakhalin (talk) 16:26, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:Злобин П.С. - please, don't just delete sections you don't believe in. Write a counterargument! If everywhere in the Net some statement A is made about a subject B, then the article about B should mention it. It would be a bad encyclopedia if it doesn't! If statement A is controversial - write about this controversy! If it is simply wrong - write why it is wrong! But it should not be just omitted! Public misconceptions should be addressed, not ignored! Thank you for your collaboration, and please contribute to the article; add a section; add arguments against this whole Veles story, don't just vandalize it! Khakhalin (talk) 15:42, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Golosov Ravine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120328083045/http://www.svet.sva.name/kolom.html to http://www.svet.sva.name/kolom.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:23, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]