This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Greetings! I know you've waited a few months for a review, but I have good news! I'm stuck in a tin can for 5 hours tomorrow late night UTC, so I'm going to use that time wisely to review this article. I expect to have the review posted in the early morning hours UTC the following day. (Approximately less than 36 hours from this post.) I look forward to reading and reviewing this article. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 18:15, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Add a semi colon (;) after "its entire operation". Add an apostrophe (') for museum's and remove the word "that" so it would say: "...its entire operation; the museum's operating costs were covered..."
Unless Cruise Night is the proper name of a specific event it should not be capitalized. If it is a proper name, it should not be referred to as "a" Cruise Night.
This is a bit odd, even if it is a proper name for a specific event, the fact it is not singular still allows "a". I've reorganized it as a result to clear up the wording, but the "a" remains as of the moment. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:53, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What has happened to the collection? If you know/can find out, it should be included.
This is obviously tough, coverage went when the museum closed, but much of it appears to have been set for its return to the rightful owners (or donators, for instance) and Guerrera's personal collection has been retained. Though I can't find anything concrete. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:53, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Were there any effect or impacts to tourism? Do we know/have this information?
Sorta covered in the article, but overall impact was minimal. The last two sentences of Impact are all I could get, and even then, it is not a subject likely to generate prolonged interest or a study. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:53, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Disclaimer: This whole section is just me ranting about the lack of photos and does not in any way affect the GA status of this article. TLSuda (talk) 18:24, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This article really should have images, but they are not required to pass GA criteria. Judging from Google's street view, the building has been changed to "Glasses Galore."
Someone could reach out to the owners of www.goldenagetruckmuseum.com/ to see about releasing that one photo under a free license. That website could also be linked from an External links section.
The article is very well written and you've tackled my requests and answered my questions, so I'm happy to promote this to Good Article. TLSuda (talk) 03:14, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Golden Age of Trucking Museum. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
