Talk:Gold Coast Historic District (Richland, Washington)

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gold Coast Historic District (Richland, Washington). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chronology garbled

This article redundantly recounts the history of Richland, which has its own entry, without clarifying how the Gold Coast district fits in. The historic district was built after the war, starting around 1950, as part of the Cold War expansion of plutonium manufacturing. Whoever takes on the task of editing this should also find out when it came to be called the "Gold Coast". I left the neighborhood in 1956 as a child, and it definitely didn't have the name then. Incidentally, Richland was never a closed town -- another error that should be corrected. --Cpacker666 (talk) 02:41, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The reference in the article is the original application for the National Register of Historic Places. It very clearly indicates the period of significance as 1943-1949, and the text puts the build dates well be fore 1950. "The Gold Coast Historic District was constructed between 1943 and 1949 by the United States government through contracts initially with the E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company (DuPont), and later the General Electric Company." It also says, "The name "Gold Coast" was an informal reference to the area in the 1940s and 50s because it provided housing for white-collar employees and executives/managers of the Hanford Engineer Works (HEW) and was later home to many of the community's doctors, lawyers and other higher income professionals." I dont want to doubt your childhood recollections, but they dont reconcile with the statements in the NRHP, and would be OR anyway (Original Research, a wikipedia no-no). If you have reference-backed information, please share it. Thanks! Nothingofwater (talk) 00:32, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The original article dated the neighborhood incorrectly from the early 1940s because it was based largely on the introductory material in the application for historic status. That content is misleading because for some reason it contains background history of Richland as a whole. From the document's enumeration of the properties to be included in the historic district, however, it's clear that the district was intended to include only several dozen houses built in the 1948-49 construction boom after General Electric had become the Hanford operator. I have rewritten the article to remedy these errors. Cpacker666 (talk) 03:03, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Better explanation of the 'alphabet houses'

Can someone add an explanation of the 'alphabet houses' mentioned in the article? Having lived in Richland, in one of these houses, I get it - but to an outsider it may not be obvious. An explanation with citations would be great. Nothingofwater (talk) 19:56, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]