Talk:Going Blank Again

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Hill, John (September 17, 2015). "Rank Your Records: Ride's Mark Gardener on Four Records in Six Years". Noisey. Vice. Retrieved September 23, 2016.
http://thequietus.com/articles/09727-ride-interview-going-blank-again
http://drownedinsound.com/in_depth/4145511-andy-bell-of-ride-amp-oasis--it-would-be-a-shame-if-we-never-got-to-play-those-songs-one-more-time
https://www.uncut.co.uk/features/ride-on-the-creation-of-all-their-albums-its-a-hell-of-a-thing-to-be-inside-128271/
https://www.brooklynvegan.com/rides-going-blank-again-went-beyond-nowhere-and-shoegaze-brilliantly/
Bergstrom, John (12 March 2012). "Can't Even Be Bothered: Two Great British Indie Rock Albums Turn 20". PopMatters. Retrieved 28 June 2022.

I'd love to see this become a featured article

Don't know where I'd find the sources, but this album needs justice - in my opinion, it's better than Loveless (album), which is a featured article.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 00:59, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've expanded it a bit. Maybe I'll expand it more.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 06:37, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's annoying that Google Books won't let me see the full sources for stuff which could be useful to expanding the article.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 07:02, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that Loveless has a story behind it; it was influential, popular in the US, and it remains simultaneously the shoegazing album and a superb example of a unique and awesome style. Although Going Blank Again is a great listen it doesn't really have a story to tell. The bands it influenced were swept away by Britpop, and what is there to say? It's not enough for a featured article to cover the topic as thoroughly as possible, the topic itself has to merit such coverage. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 20:44, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Going Blank Again. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:37, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]