Talk:Gogmagog (giant)
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Anglo-Norman Albina story
[edit]The "Anglo-Norman Albina story" section looks quite plagiarized from my edit in Albion. Arent you supposed to attribute this sort of thing to the source wiki article? Anyway I dont think it is a good idea having fully elaborate content on the same material in two places like this. --Kiyoweap (talk) 06:45, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Nothing should be sourced to another Wikipedia article - see Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source. It should be cited to reliable secondary sources. If it is relevant to include the story in two places, there is no reason not to do so - although usually you would find one article with all the detail, and the other with a summary that is linked to the article section with the main detail. Simon Burchell (talk) 08:38, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Simon Burchell:, perhaps I didnt make it clear enough, but I didnt mean an attribution should be made to me within the article itself. I meant that attribution should be made to the "source wiki article" in the edit summary. It falls under the guideline WP:COPYWITHIN, which you should familiarize yourself with if you're thinking it's okay to casually engage in copy and paste jobs from one wikiarticle to another. --Kiyoweap (talk) 17:33, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Rescued image
[edit]A section was recently deleted, including this image, which might be a good example of 19th century use of the giants Gog and Magog.
References
- ^ Williams, Leslie; Williams, W. H. A. (2003). Daniel O'Connell, the British Press, and the Irish Famine. Ashgate. p. 311.