Talk:Godman's rock-wallaby

Mammals: Monotremes and Marsupials Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Monotremes and Marsupials (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Australia: Queensland / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Godman's rock-wallaby is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Authority

The article said Godman classified it, but MSW says the authority is Oldfield Thomas. - UtherSRG (talk) 02:22, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas tended to name things after the collector. It's also against the rules to name the animal after yourself so I suspct Thomas is the correct authority and Godman collected it. --Aranae 18:53, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Source needed

This is a very strange wallaby. I'm not sure if its description is a hoax. I think that the name is true, but I'm not sure about the rest. Needs to be verified with the original scientific papers if it is true. Nicolharper 01:28, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Nicolharper, absorbing food into a genome and glowing in the dark definitely needs a source --Aranae 18:53, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Without a source the glow-in-the-dark bit needs to be dropped. The problem is that it is integrated throughout the article. Is anything here factually accurate? The only thing I can verify is that they're from Queensland. Any chance they actually are the mascot of the Olympics? --Aranae 01:46, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's a pile of rubbish. This seems to be the best info: http://eriss.erin.gov.au/cgi-bin/abrs/fauna/details.pl?pstrVol=MARSUPIALIA;pstrTaxa=426;pstrChecklistMode=1 - UtherSRG (talk) 02:46, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is crap, my Australian mammal book mentions nothing of it (and I am sure that something ilke that would be included). --liquidGhoul 08:39, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've gutted it. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:54, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]