Talk:God Save the South

A fact from God Save the South appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 July 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that "God Save the South" (sheet music cover pictured) was the unofficial national anthem of the Confederacy?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/God Save the South.

Wikipedia

United States: Music / Civil War / History Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Music portal This article is supported by WikiProject American music (assessed as Low-importance).
	American Civil War portal This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - American Civil War task force.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history.

Former countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Military history: Culture / North America / United States / American Civil War C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

Anthem

It was suppost to be an anthom? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.33.172.83 (talk • contribs) 19:24, 6 April 2010

Its Anthem, and yes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.152.198.167 (talk) 11:59, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

God Save the Queen

"was also set to the tune of the British national anthem; 'God Save the Queen'". There's no way to seriously sing this article's lyrics to the tune of "God Save the Queen". Try it; the notes don't fit the syllables at all. (To puzzled Americans: "God Save the Queen" is the same tune as My Country, 'Tis of Thee.) Your reference is behind a paywall, but here's the sheet music I found. The tune is "God Save the Queen" (I can read music) but the lyrics don't match this article at all, except for the title "God Save the South". Art LaPella (talk) 01:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It does work if you take away some of the repetitions. The Royal C (talk) 13:11, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"citizens of the Confederacy's personal association with George Washington"

There is assertion in the article of a citizens of the Confederacy's personal association with George Washington. This seems completely WP:EXCEPTIONAL and needs at least direct attribution from one or more highly reliable sources. As it is now, there is no attribution and seems like pure OR or revisionist opinion. Toddst1 (talk) 16:32, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, the Washington Times article makes no mention of the fifth verse or justification for "the cause". I've marked that sentence as {{fv}}. That entire paragraph needs to go as there is nothing to support it. Toddst1 (talk) 16:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed it. Please be sure to comply with WP:BURDEN before considering restoring it. Toddst1 (talk) 17:38, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@The C of E:has restored the "justification for the cause" passage that is not mentioned in the WT article. This appears to be WP:SYN and is not at all helpful. Tagged as such. Your lack of engagement here and WP:EW tactics are pretty poor. Toddst1 (talk) 22:12, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that I should have used the 1st source for the other one as the WP source didn't make it clear. That is why I reworded it and put the source where it should have been. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 22:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding the source for the first sentence of that paragraph, but the second sentence appears to be fabrication and from my reading is not supported by either citation. As requested in the article tags, please provide the text that you feel supports this. Toddst1 (talk) 22:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I've waited a few days but no response. I will remove the contested material. Please don't restore it unless discussed here first. Toddst1 (talk) 23:03, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

never adopted

The infobox says this was adopted in 1861, but the article says it was never officially adopted. I think the adoption date should be removed. Toddst1 (talk) 20:57, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. Furthermore, if it was never adopted, the "until" date makes no sense. I've removed them. — fourthords | =Λ= | 21:56, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on God Save the South. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101026010559/http://www.civilwar.org/education/history/on-the-homefront/culture/music/god-save-the-south/god-save-the-south.html to http://www.civilwar.org/education/history/on-the-homefront/culture/music/god-save-the-south/god-save-the-south.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:04, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lyrics

@E bitcc lol:, Please can you explain why you are constantly adding the lyrics to the article despite WP:NOTLYRICS? The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 20:14, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

what

WP:NOTLYRICS is for copyrighted music published after 1926. Martianmister (talk) 11:29, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]