Talk:Go Farther in Lightness/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 08:19, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a. (reference section):
- b. (citations to reliable sources):
- c. (OR):
- d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a. (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a. (major aspects):
- b. (focused):
- a. (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/fail:
- Pass/fail:
(Criteria marked are unassessed)
This is quite an old nomination for the GAN backlog! --K. Peake 08:19, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Infobox and lead
[edit]- The exact release date needs to be sourced in the body as 18th August
- Same for the recording months
- Sony Music Studios, Sydney → Sony Music, Sydney
- The lead is quite disordered at the moment; the first sentence should be followed by the info currently in the second para, then reception and awards followed by commercial performance and legacy
- "It debuted at number one" → "The album debuted at number one"
- Mention it was certified platinum in Australia and by the Australian Recording Industry Association (ARIA)
- "the album won four awards" → "four awards were won by Gang of Youths"
- "Go Farther in Lightness's lyrics focus" → "its lyrics focus"
- "bleakness and triumph,"" → "bleakness and triumph"," per MOS:QUOTE
- Shouldn't the tour be mentioned by name in the lead?
- "where three tracks from the album placed" → "where three other tracks placed"
- "was critically acclaimed by reviewers and" → "was acclaimed by music critics and"
- "It topped the annual" → "A top position was achieved the annual"
- "and two of its tracks featured" → "and two of the tracks featured"
Background
[edit]- Add the "I don't think" part to end the frontman's quote
- Where is the EP release sourced in relation to his quote?
- No visa complications are sourced
Composition
[edit]- I think swapping these sub-sections would make for the correct order
Lyricism
[edit]- "something you love,"" → "something you love"," per MOS:QUOTE – these are throughout when you have punctuation inside quotes at unsuitable points
- Where are the recurring themes sourced?
- Pipe soul to Human spirit
Production and recording
[edit]- Wikilink Darlinghurst to itself
- Avoid any usage of claim per WP:CLAIM
- Audio sample looks good!
- I have noticed more MOS:QUOTE issues in this sub-section, as I explained for the other one
- "interludes for the album" → "interludes for Go Farther in Lightness"
- The interpolation is not sourced
Release
[edit]- Retitle to Release and promotion
- Wikilink David Le'aupepe on the img text
- The release date is sourced as 9 February with no music video, mention this was the lead single from Go Father in Lightness too
- "They would later perform" → "Gang of Youths would later perform"
- The ARIA position needs a source and the link should be to ARIA Charts
- "was released on 26 July" → "was released on 26 July 2017"
- The sixth and final single is not sourced
- Remove wikilink on Australian Albums Chart and this needs to be sourced; if not, change the information
- Reword the certification sentence to saying the album was certified in Australia by the Australian Recording Industry Association (ARIA) with the number of copies
Tour
[edit]- "made their United States TV" → "made their US TV" per MOS:US
- "The band toured" → "Gang of Youths toured"
- "They performed for" → "The band performed for"
Critical reception
[edit]- "received widespread critical acclaim." → "was met with widespread critical acclaim from music critics."
- "calling it "a remarkable" → "calling the record "a remarkable"
- MOS:QWQ issues again
- "called the album "a" → "called Go Farther in Lightness "a"
- Remove pipe on The Music
Legacy
[edit]- "has been featured in" → "has led to rankings in" and end the sentence here, starting a new one for RS
- "It also topped" → "The album also topped"
- The Powderfinger, Chet Faker and 200 parts are not sourced
- "Further, two more songs featured" → "Furthermore, two songs featured"
- "has become the band's" → "has become Gang of Youth's"
- Remove the 95 million part since it's not sourced
- Table looks good!
Track listing
[edit]- Good
Personnel
[edit]- Good
Charts
[edit]- Good
Certifications
[edit]- Good
See also
[edit]- Good
References
[edit]- Cite Triple J as the sole publisher for all those refs and only wikilink on ref 6
- Remove the publisher from refs 3, 13 and 49
- Wikilink Music Feeds only on ref 4
- Remove or replace ref 15 per WP:RSSM
- What is ref 16 and why is it reliable?
- Ref 18 is a duplicate of ref 4
- Wikilink Dropbox and move to via with Australian Recording Industry Association as publisher on ref 25
- What exactly makes refs 27 and 31 reliable sources?
- Wikilink Renowned for Sound on ref 40
- WP:OVERLINK of The Music on ref 47
- Cite Double J as publisher instead and remove Australian Broadcasting Corporation on ref 49
- Ref 52 is a duplicate of ref 42
Final comments and verdict
[edit]- On hold until all of the issues are fixed; this is a bit messy but good luck! --K. Peake 19:08, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hey @Kyle Peake, I believe I've made all the suggested edits. Thanks so much for the feedback! Marcostev88 (talk) 13:00, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- Marcostev88 You still need to get rid of the duplicate RS ref as I pointed out. --K. Peake 07:04, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Kyle Peake fixed— sorry about that. Marcostev88 (talk) 15:38, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
- ✓ Pass now, well done on picking up quickly on the remaining problem! --K. Peake 16:48, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Kyle Peake Thanks for the review, appreciate your time! Marcostev88 (talk) 01:04, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
- ✓ Pass now, well done on picking up quickly on the remaining problem! --K. Peake 16:48, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Kyle Peake fixed— sorry about that. Marcostev88 (talk) 15:38, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
- Marcostev88 You still need to get rid of the duplicate RS ref as I pointed out. --K. Peake 07:04, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hey @Kyle Peake, I believe I've made all the suggested edits. Thanks so much for the feedback! Marcostev88 (talk) 13:00, 18 August 2023 (UTC)